IFRS S2[1] Climate-related Disclosures became effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2025. This intelligence brief examines the state of adoption across monitored financial institutions in Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa — the three largest African capital markets — and finds that structural and governance disclosure is gaining traction while substantive climate scenario analysis and physical risk quantification remain in early stages across virtually all monitored institutions.
IFRS S2, published by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) in June 2023[1], requires entities to disclose information about climate-related risks and opportunities across four pillars, aligned with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework:
For financial institutions, IFRS S2 also requires disclosure of financed emissions — the climate impact of a bank's or insurer's portfolio and underwriting activities — which represents the most analytically demanding element of the standard for institutions in emerging markets.
Nigeria does not yet have a mandatory IFRS S2 adoption timeline established by the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria (FRCN), though alignment is expected. The CBN's Climate Risk Management Framework (2023)[5] provides partial alignment with the IFRS S2 risk management and metrics pillars for banking institutions. However, there is no equivalent insurance sector climate disclosure requirement from NAICOM at this stage.
Monitored Nigerian banking institutions — including the five Tier-1 commercial banks — show governance pillar disclosure that is improving, with board climate risk committees or formally mandated board-level climate risk oversight now documented in the majority of Tier-1 bank annual reports. Strategy and metrics disclosure quality is significantly weaker, with the most common gap being the absence of quantitative climate scenario analysis and meaningful Scope 3 or financed emissions data.
Kenya's Capital Markets Authority (CMA) issued updated corporate governance guidelines in 2023[4] that incorporate climate-related disclosure expectations aligned with IFRS S2. The Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) Sustainability Reporting Requirements align with GRI and TCFD. Kenya's banking sector shows moderate IFRS S2 governance alignment, with the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) Climate Risk Guideline (2021) providing the primary regulatory driver.
Kenyan institutions are generally further ahead on stakeholder engagement and sustainability programme documentation than Nigerian peers, but similarly underprepared on quantitative climate scenario analysis and financed emissions.
South Africa represents the most advanced African market for IFRS S2 adoption. The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) published Guidance Note 7 of 2022[3] on climate-related disclosure, aligning with TCFD. JSE Listing Requirements incorporate sustainability reporting. Several major South African financial institutions — particularly banks and long-term insurers — have been producing TCFD-aligned reports since 2020–2021.
| IFRS S2 Pillar | Nigeria | Kenya | South Africa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governance | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate-High |
| Strategy (qualitative) | Low-Moderate | Low-Moderate | Moderate |
| Strategy (scenario analysis) | Very Low | Low | Low-Moderate |
| Risk Management | Low-Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
| Scope 1 & 2 Emissions | Low-Moderate | Moderate | Moderate-High |
| Scope 3 Emissions | Very Low | Very Low | Low-Moderate |
| Financed Emissions | Absent | Very Low | Low-Moderate |
| Climate Targets | Very Low | Low | Moderate |
IFRS S2 requires entities to use climate scenario analysis to assess the resilience of their strategy and business model to climate-related risks. For financial institutions, this includes assessing the impact of different temperature pathways (e.g., 1.5°C, 2°C, 3°C+ scenarios) on loan books, investment portfolios, and underwriting exposures. Across all three African markets, this requirement represents the most significant capability gap. Very few African financial institutions have the internal quantitative modelling capability, scenario data infrastructure, or climate risk analytical teams to produce genuinely substantive scenario analysis.
For banks and insurers, financed emissions (the GHG emissions attributable to the entity's lending, investment, and underwriting activities) represent the most material climate exposure in most cases. Yet this is the area with the lowest disclosure quality across all three markets. The primary barriers are data availability at the counterparty level, methodological uncertainty (particularly for African SME borrowers with no emissions data), and the limited adoption of the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF) standard[8] in African markets.
Africa ESG & Sustainability Advisory LTD (AESA) is an ESG intelligence infrastructure company providing diagnostics, evidence governance, ratings, transformation intelligence, advisory, and knowledge programmes built for African markets. The AESA Intelligence Platform is built on the Master Indicator List (MIL-150). AESA Insights publications are drawn from the platform's live monitoring system and released under the AESA Intelligence Governance Protocol.
This publication is produced by Africa ESG & Sustainability Advisory LTD for intelligence and educational purposes. It reflects observations drawn from the AESA monitoring system as at the publication date. It does not constitute investment advice, legal advice, or regulatory guidance. © 2026 Africa ESG & Sustainability Advisory LTD. All rights reserved.